Hillary 2020? Clue: Clinton's Campaign Still Active and RAISING Money

Hillary Clinton isn't only raising hell on her endless "Why I'thousand not president" alibi bout. She's also still raising coin via her campaign, helping fuel speculation that she may be entertaining a third White Business firm run.

As the Washington Standard reports, "According to the FEC, Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign is nevertheless active, and it actually raised $165,902.73 during the first half dozen months of 2019. During that same period of time, the entrada spent $131,112.68, and that left her with a state of war chest of $650,264.43. That isn't enough to win the Autonomous nomination, only information technology would certainly be enough to go another run for the White Firm off the ground rather rapidly."

Moreover, with "impeachment mania reaching a fever pitch in Washington and with the Biden campaign fading, Hillary may sense an opening," the Standard theorizes. "She had a total slate of media appearances scheduled for this week, and and then far she has done nothing to dispel the rumors that she may be getting into the race."

The Standard isn't lone in thus conjecturing. American Thinker'south Doris O'Brien opines today that Clinton does have the hope "that through some third-time'south-the-charm magic she could at terminal realize her dream of becoming the commencement female president of the United states of america." The site's editor in principal, dandy Clinton watcher Thomas Lifson, wrote last Thursday that "Clinton is out there doing TV interviews, slimmed downwardly and no longer wearing tent dresses, and looking ready for activity. My wild guess is that she will enter the race." And another Thinker writer, Bill Shanefelt, assuredly stated Fri that "Hillary's going to get in."

Too registering certainty is former chief strategist for President Trump, Steve Bannon. On Play tricks Business on Mon he said of Clinton, unabashedly, "She is running. She'south just trying to decide how to fit her way in." Bannon's theory (video below) is that the Democrat field is currently weak enough to requite Clinton an opening.

If Clinton does run, she volition savour the benefit of incumbency — at to the lowest degree in her own heed. Never able to accept her 2022 defeat — to explicate it away she even (ghost?) wrote a book, What Happened? — Clinton's litany of excuses (video below) for it have included "sexism," white female voters controlled by their husbands, The Russians™, the (left-fly) media(!), Bernie Sanders, "voter suppression and voter purging," "hacking," and "imitation stories," as she put it concluding weekend.

(Note that leftists ascertain "voter suppression" thus: whatsoever endeavour to preclude Democrat vote fraud. Considering, of course, dead voters, multiple voters, and illegal-alien voters are voters, too!)

Yet now Clinton has transitioned from "I lost because" to "I didn't really lose" considering, equally she recently put it, Trump is an "illegitimate president" (video below).

Interestingly, Clinton says above, "We know that the Russians hacked the DNC," referencing damaging Democrat east-mails released by WikiLeaks. But not just is that disputed, consider that her complaint really is, translated: The truth came out about united states — and it was devastating!

Call back that leftists simply complained almost being hacked; they never disputed the accuracy of what was hacked.

Too note that the Obama administration actually used government intelligence agencies to spy on Trump, and even at present deep country officials are using Gov-leaks to attempt to destroy him. Yet they can't detect anything more valid than the Russian-collusion hoax and the current Ukraine fantasy (and if geographical direction is any indicator here, the next scandal attempt should involve Moldova).

Moreover, Clinton has it exactly backwards. With extreme mainstream and social-media bias (a report constitute 92 percent of Trump coverage to be negative), vote fraud, vote harvesting, and with Trump raising but half the money Clinton did during the 2022 ballot bike, it'due south a miracle he won at all.

Every bit for the 2022 bike, why is there again talk of Clinton rising? It was largely unthinkable fifty-fifty six months ago; Clinton isn't well liked, afterwards all, and the Democrats at the fourth dimension believed they had a strong bench. But their prize identity-politics candidate, Senator Kamala Harris, fizzled, with Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard's aid; Jumblin' Joe Biden is an imploding gaffe machine; Bernie Sanders just had a heart set on; and the other candidates have all taken radical positions (e.thousand., free healthcare for illegals) that many Democrats fright render them unelectable. Then now Hillary, who could conceivably enter the primaries tardily and without adopting those farthermost stances, may wait good in comparison.

That said, Clinton is prideful. I suspect she only enters races she believes she'll virtually surely win (she had reason to believe she'd prevail in 2008 and 2016, before suffering two humiliating defeats to Barack Obama and Trump). And then I think that, first, columnist Mark Steyn may exist correct when saying (last video in a higher place) that she wants to exist "asked" to run. Second, information technology's likely she'd merely consider joining the fray under two scenarios:

• if internal polling shows her a shoe-in for the nomination (losing to Elizabeth Warren would be an unacceptable humiliation); or

• if she's drafted during a brokered convention.

Of grade, Clinton had in March ruled out a 2022 presidential run. But that was and so. She also was against aforementioned-sexual activity "marriage" before she was for it and for Obama's trade and immigration policies before she was confronting them. It all depends on what her "truth" is when the time comes.

Photo: AP Images